首页> 外文OA文献 >Wildfire policy and management in England: an evolving response from fire and rescue services, forestry and cross-sector groups
【2h】

Wildfire policy and management in England: an evolving response from fire and rescue services, forestry and cross-sector groups

机译:英格兰的野火政策和管理:来自消防和救援服务,林业和跨部门团体的不断变化的响应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Severe wildfires are an intermittent problem in England. The paper presents thefirst analysis of wildfire policy, showing its halting evolution over two decades.First efforts to coordinate wildfire management came from local fire operationgroups, where stakeholders such as fire services, land owners and amenitygroups shared knowledge and equipment to tackle the problem. A variety ofstructures and informal management solutions emerged in response to localneeds. Knowledge of wildfire accumulated within regional and national wildfireforums and academic networks. Only later did the need for centralemergency planning and the response to climate change produce a nationalpolicy response. Fire statistics have allowed wildfires to be spatially evidencedon a national scale only since 2009. National awareness of wildfire was spurredby the 2011 fire season, and the high-impact Swinley Forest fire, which threatened critical infrastructure and communities within 50 miles of London.Severe wildfire was included in the National Risk Register for the first time in2013. Cross-sector approaches to wildfire proved difficult as governmentresponsibility is fragmented along the hazard chain. Stakeholders such as theForestry Commission pioneered good practice in adaptive land managementto build fire resilience into UK forests. The grass-roots evolution of participatorysolutions has also been a key enabling process. A coordinated policy is nowneeded to identify best practice and to promote understanding of the role offire in the ecosystem.This article is part of a themed issue ‘The interaction of fire and mankind’.
机译:严重的野火在英格兰是一个间歇性问题。本文介绍了野火政策的首次分析,显示了其在过去二十年中的发展停滞。协调野火管理的第一项努力来自地方消防运营小组,消防部门,土地所有者和便利团体等利益相关者共享解决该问题的知识和设备。针对本地需求,出现了各种结构和非正式管理解决方案。在区域和国家野火论坛以及学术网络中积累的野火知识。直到后来,才需要中央应急计划和对气候变化的反应才产生了国家政策反应。火灾统计数据仅允许自2009年以来才在全国范围内进行野火的空间证据。2011年的火灾季节和高影响力的Swinley森林大火激发了人们对野火的认识,这对伦敦50英里范围内的关键基础设施和社区造成了威胁。在2013年首次被列入《国家风险登记册》。事实证明,由于政府责任在危险链上分散,跨部门的野火方法很难解决。林业委员会等利益相关方率先在适应性土地管理方面引入了良好做法,以在英国森林中建立抗灾能力。参与式解决方案的基层发展也是一个关键的推动过程。现在需要采取协调一致的政策来确定最佳实践,并增进对火在生态系统中的作用的理解。本文是“火与人类的相互作用”这一主题问题的一部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号